Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ °ñÀ¯Âø¼º ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®ÀÇ °æ»çµµº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯À§¿Í ÀÀ·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÀû ¿¬±¸

A finite element analysis on the 3-unit fixed prosthesis supported with a natural tooth and angle variable implant

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1993³â 31±Ç 4È£ p.580 ~ 610
°íÇö, ¿ìÀÌÇü, ¹Ú³²¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°íÇö ( Ko Hyun ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¿ìÀÌÇü ( Woo Yi-Hyung ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹Ú³²¼ö ( Park Nam-Soo ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the deflection and stress distribution at the supporting bone and it¡¯s superstructure by the alteration of angulation between implant and it¡¯s implant abutment. For this study, the free-end saddle case of mandibular first and second molar missing would be planned to restore with fixed prosthesis. So the mandibular second premolar was prepared for abutment, and the cylinder type osseointegrated implant was placed at the site of mandibular second molar for abutment. @ES The results were as follows: @EN 1. Observing at standard model, the amount of total deflection at the distobuccal cusp-tip of pontic under concentrated load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all, and the amount of total deflection at the buccal cusp-tip of second premolar under distributed load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed